Dictionary Definition
broadleaf adj : having relatively broad rather
than needle-like or scale-like leaves [syn: broad-leafed,
broad-leaved]
[also: broadleaves
(pl)]
User Contributed Dictionary
English
Adjective
- Used in the name of a plant or tree: having broad leaves.
Synonyms
Derived terms
Noun
Synonyms
- (tree of Jamaica): almond tree
Extensive Definition
The flowering plants or angiosperms are the most
widespread group of land plants.
The flowering plants and the gymnosperms comprise the two
extant groups of seed plants.
The flowering plants are distinguished from other seed plants by a
series of apomorphies,
or derived characteristics.
Angiosperm derived characteristics
The
flowers of flowering plants are the most remarkable feature
distinguishing them from other seed plants. Flowers aided
angiosperms by enabling a wider range of evolutionary relationships
and broadening the ecological
niches open to them, allowing flowering plants to eventually
dominate terrestrial
ecosystems.
- Stamens with two pairs of pollen sacs
- Reduced male parts, three cells
The
closed carpel of angiosperms also allows adaptations to specialized
pollination syndromes and controls to prevent self-fertilization,
thereby maintaining increased diversity. Once the ovary is
fertilized the carpel and some surrounding tissues develop into a
fruit, another opportunity for angiosperms to increase their
domination of the terrestrial ecosystem with evolutionary
adaptations to dispersal
mechanisms.
- Reduced female gametophyte, seven cells with eight nuclei
Endosperm
formation generally begins after fertilization and before the first
division of the zygote.
Endosperm is a highly nutritive tissue that can provide food for
the developing embryo,
the cotyledons, and sometimes for the seedling when it first
appears.
These distinguishing characteristics taken
together have made the angiosperms the most diverse and numerous
land plants and the most commercially important group to humans.
The major exception to the dominance of terrestrial ecosystems by
flowering plants is the coniferous
forest.
Evolution
Land plants have existed for about 425 million years. Early land plants reproduced by spores like their aquatic counterparts. Marine organisms can easily scatter copies of themselves to float away and grow elsewhere. Land plants soon found it advantageous to protect their copies from drying out and other hazards by enclosing them in a case, the seed. Early seed bearing plants, like the ginkgo, and conifers (such as pines and firs), did not produce flowers.The earliest fossil of an angiosperm, or
flowering plant, Archaefructus
liaoningensis, is dated to about 125 million years BPhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/flower/anatomy.html.
Pollen, considered directly linked to flower development, has been
found in the fossil record perhaps as long ago as 130 million
years.
While there is only hard evidence of such flowers
existing about 130 million years ago, there is some circumstantial
evidence that they may have existed 250 million years ago. A
chemical used by plants to defend their flowers, oleanane, has been detected in
fossil plants that old, including gigantopteridshttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/04/010403071438.htm,
which evolved at that time and bear many of the traits of modern,
flowering plants, though they are not known to be flowering plants
themselves, because only their stems and prickles have been found
preserved in detail, one of the earliest examples of petrification.
The apparently sudden appearance of relatively
modern flowers in the fossil record posed such a problem for the
theory of evolution
that it was called an "abominable mystery" by Charles
Darwin. However the fossil record has grown since the time of
Darwin, and recently discovered angiosperm fossils such as
Archaefructus, along with further discoveries of fossil
gymnosperms, suggest how angiosperm characteristics may have been
acquired in a series of steps. Several groups of extinct
gymnosperms, particularly seed ferns,
have been proposed as the
ancestors of flowering plants but there is no continuous fossil
evidence showing exactly how flowers evolved. Some older fossils,
such as the upper Triassic Sanmiguelia,
have been suggested. Based on current evidence, some propose that
the ancestors of the angiosperms diverged from an unknown group of
gymnosperms during the late Triassic (245-202
million years ago). The relationship of the earlier gigantopterids to
flowering plants is still enigmatic.
A close relationship between Angiosperms and
Gnetophytes,
suggested on the basis of morphological
evidence, has been disputed on the basis of molecular
evidence that suggest Gnetophytes are more closely related to
other gymnosperms.
Recent DNA analysis (molecular
systematics) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3405_flower.html
http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/full/91/6/997
show that Amborella
trichopoda, found on the Pacific island of New
Caledonia, belongs to a sister group
of the other flowering plants, and morphological studies
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-05/uoca-spp051506.php
suggest that it has features which may have been characteristic of
the earliest flowering plants.
The great angiosperm radiation,
when a great diversity of angiosperms appear in the fossil record,
occurred in the mid-Cretaceous
(approximately 100 million years ago). However, a study in 2007
estimated that the division of the five most recent (the genus
Ceratophyllum,
the family Chloranthaceae,
the eudicots, the
magnoliids, and the
monocots) of the eight
main groups occurred around 140 million years ago.http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/104/49/19363?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=1&andorexacttitle=and&andorexacttitleabs=and&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT
By the late Cretaceous, angiosperms appear to have become the
predominant group of land plants, and many fossil plants
recognizable as belonging to modern families (including beech, oak, maple, and magnolia) appeared.
However, some authors have proposed an earlier
origin for angiosperms, sometime in the Paleozoic (251
million years ago or more).
It is generally assumed that the function
of flowers, from the start, was to involve mobile animals in their reproduction processes.
Pollen can be scattered without bright colors and obvious shapes.
Expending energy on these
structures would appear to be a liability, unless they provide
significant benefit.
Island
genetics provides one proposed explanation for the sudden,
fully developed appearance of flowering plants. Island genetics is
believed to be a common source of speciation in general,
especially when it comes to radical adaptations which seem to have
required inferior transitional forms. Flowering plants may have
evolved in an isolated setting like an island or island chain, where the
plants bearing them were able to develop a highly specialized
relationship with some specific animal (a wasp, for example). Such a
relationship, with a hypothetical wasp carrying pollen from one
plant to another much the way fig wasps do
today, could result in both the plant(s) and their partners
developing a high degree of specialization.
Note that the wasp example is not incidental; bees, which apparently evolved
specifically due to mutualistic plant relationships, are descended
from wasps.
Animals are also involved in the distribution of
seeds. Fruit,
which is formed by the enlargement flower parts, is frequently a
seed disbursal tool which depends upon animals, who eat or
otherwise disturb it, incidentally scattering the seeds it contains
(see frugivory). While
many such mutualistic
relationships remain too fragile to survive competition
with mainland animals and spread, flowers proved to be an unusually
effective means of production, spreading (whatever their actual
origin) to become the dominant form of land plant life.
Flowers are derived from leaf and stem components, arising from a
combination of genes
normally responsible for forming new shoots.http://unisci.com/stories/20012/0615015.htm
The most primitive flowers are thought to have had a variable
number of flower parts, often separate from (but in contact with)
each other. The flowers would have tended to grow in a spiral
pattern, to be bisexual (in plants, this means both male and female
parts on the same flower), and to be dominated by the ovary
(female part). As flowers grew more advanced, some variations
developed parts fused together, with a much more specific number
and design, and with either specific sexes per flower or plant, or
at least "ovary inferior".
Flower evolution continues to the present day;
modern flowers have been so profoundly influenced by humans that
some of them cannot be pollinated in nature. Many modern,
domesticated flowers used to be simple weeds, which only sprouted
when the ground was disturbed. Some of them tended to grow with
human crops, perhaps already having symbiotic companion
plant relationships with them, and the prettiest did not get
plucked because of their beauty, developing a dependence upon and
special adaptation to human affection.http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050526_flower_power.html
Classification
There are eight groups of living
angiosperms:
- Amborella - a single species of shrub from New Caledonia
- Nymphaeales - about 80 species - water lilies and Hydatellaceae
- Austrobaileyales - about 100 species
History of classification
The botanical term "Angiosperm", from the ancient Greek αγγειον (receptacle) and σπερμα (seed), was coined in the form Angiospermae by Paul Hermann in 1690, as the name of that one of his primary divisions of the plant kingdom. This included flowering plants possessing seeds enclosed in capsules, distinguished from his Gymnospermae, or flowering plants with achenial or schizo-carpic fruits, the whole fruit or each of its pieces being here regarded as a seed and naked. The term and its antonym were maintained by Carolus Linnaeus with the same sense, but with restricted application, in the names of the orders of his class Didynamia. Its use with any approach to its modern scope only became possible after 1827, when Robert Brown established the existence of truly naked ovules in the Cycadeae and Coniferae, and applied to them the name Gymnosperms. From that time onwards, so long as these Gymnosperms were, as was usual, reckoned as dicotyledonous flowering plants, the term Angiosperm was used antithetically by botanical writers, with varying scope, as a group-name for other dicotyledonous plants.In 1851,
Hofmeister discovered the changes occurring in the embryo-sac
of flowering plants, and determined the correct relationships of
these to the Cryptogamia.
This fixed the position of Gymnosperms as a class distinct from
Dicotyledons, and the term Angiosperm then gradually came to be
accepted as the suitable designation for the whole of the flowering
plants other than Gymnosperms, including the classes of
Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons. This is the sense in which the
term is used today.
In most taxonomies, the flowering plants are
treated as a coherent group. The most popular descriptive name has
been Angiospermae (Angiosperms), with Anthophyta ("flowering
plants") a second choice. These names are not linked to any rank.
The Wettstein
system and the Engler
system use the name Angiospermae, at the assigned rank of
subdivision. The Reveal
system treated flowering plants as subdivision Magnoliophytina
(Frohne & U. Jensen ex Reveal, Phytologia 79: 70 1996), but
later split it to Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida and Rosopsida. The
Takhtajan
system and Cronquist
system treat this group at the rank of division,
leading to the name Magnoliophyta (from the family name
Magnoliaceae). The Dahlgren
system and Thorne
system (1992) treat this group at the rank of class, leading to
the name Magnoliopsida. However, the APG system, of
1998, and the APG II
system, of 2003, do not treat it as a formal taxon but rather
treat it as a clade without a formal botanical
name and use the name angiosperms for this clade.
The internal classification of this group has
undergone considerable revision. The Cronquist
system, proposed by Arthur
Cronquist in 1968 and published in
its full form in 1981, is still widely
used, but is no longer believed to accurately reflect phylogeny. A general consensus
about how the flowering plants should be arranged has recently
begun to emerge, through the work of the Angiosperm
Phylogeny Group, who published an influential reclassification
of the angiosperms in 1998. An update
incorporating more recent research was published as APG II
The number of families
in APG (1998) was 462. In APG II
- Orchidaceae (orchid family): 21,950 species
- Poaceae or Gramineae (grass family): 10,035
- Lamiaceae or Labiatae (mint family): 7,173
- Euphorbiaceae (spurge family): 5,735
- Cyperaceae (sedge family): 4,350
- Malvaceae (mallow family): 4,225
- Araceae (aroid family): 4,025
In the list above (showing only the 10 largest
families), the Orchidaceae, Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Araceae are
monocot families; the others are dicot families.
Vascular anatomy
The amount and complexity of
tissue-formation in flowering plants exceeds that of Gymnosperms.
The vascular
bundles of the stem are arranged such that the xylem and phloem form concentric
rings.
In the Dicotyledons, the bundles in the very
young stem are arranged in an open ring, separating a central pith
from an outer cortex. In each bundle, separating the xylem and
phloem, is a layer of meristem or active formative tissue known as
cambium; by the
formation of a layer of cambium between the bundles
(interfascicular cambium) a complete ring is formed, and a regular
periodical increase in thickness results from the development of
xylem on the inside and phloem on the outside. The soft phloem
becomes crushed, but the hard wood persists and forms the bulk of
the stem and branches of the woody perennial. Owing to differences
in the character of the elements produced at the beginning and end
of the season, the wood is marked out in transverse section into
concentric rings, one for each season of growth, called annual
rings.
Among the Monocotyledons, the bundles are more
numerous in the young stem and are scattered through the ground
tissue. They contain no cambium and once formed the stem increases
in diameter only in exceptional cases.
The flower, fruit, and seed
Flowers
The characteristic feature of angiosperms is the flower. Flowers show remarkable variation in form and elaboration, and provide the most trustworthy external characteristics for establishing relationships among angiosperm species. The function of the flower is to ensure fertilization of the ovule and development of fruit containing seeds. The floral apparatus may arise terminally on a shoot or from the axil of a leaf. Occasionally, as in violets, a flower arises singly in the axil of an ordinary foliage-leaf. More typically, the flower-bearing portion of the plant is sharply distinguished from the foliage-bearing or vegetative portion, and forms a more or less elaborate branch-system called an inflorescence.The reproductive cells produced by flowers are of
two kinds. Microspores which will divide to become pollen grains, are the "male"
cells and are borne in the stamens (or microsporophylls).
The "female" cells called megaspores, which will divide to become
the egg-cell (megagametogenesis),
are contained in the ovule
and enclosed in the carpel (or megasporophyll).
The flower may consist only of these parts, as in
willow, where each flower
comprises only a few stamens or two carpels. Usually other
structures are present and serve to protect the sporophylls and to
form an envelope attractive to pollinators. The individual members
of these surrounding structures are known as sepals and petals (or tepals in flowers such as Magnolia where
sepals and petals are not distinguishable from each other). The
outer series (calyx of sepals) is usually green and leaf-like, and
functions to protect the rest of the flower, especially the bud.
The inner series (corolla of petals) is generally white or brightly
colored, and is more delicate in structure. It functions to attract
insect or bird pollinators. Attraction is
effected by color, scent,
and nectar, which may be
secreted in some part of the flower. The characteristics that
attract pollinators account for the popularity of flowers and
flowering plants among humans.
While the majority of flowers are perfect or
hermaphrodite
(having both male and female parts in the same flower structure),
flowering plants have developed numerous morphological and physiological mechanisms
to reduce or prevent self-fertilization. Heteromorphic flowers have
short carpels and long stamens, or vice versa, so animal pollinators cannot easily
transfer pollen to the pistil (receptive part of the carpel).
Homomorphic flowers may employ a biochemical (physiological)
mechanism called
self-incompatibility to discriminate between self- and non-self
pollen grains. In other species, the male and female parts are
morphologically separated, developing on different flowers.
Fertilization and embryogenesis
Double fertilization refers to a process in which two sperm cells fertilize two cells in the ovary. The pollen grain adheres to the stigma of the carpel (female reproductive structure) and grows a pollen tube that penetrates the ovum through a tiny pore called a micropyle. Two sperm cells are released into the ovary through this tube. One of the two sperm cells fertilizes the egg cell, forming a diploid zygote or embryo, also called the ovule. The other sperm cell fuses with two haploid polar nuclei in the center of the embryo sac. The resulting cell is triploid (3n). This triploid cell divides through mitosis and forms the endosperm, a nutrient-rich tissue inside the fruit. When seed develops without fertilization, the process is known as apomixis.Fruit and seed
As the development of embryo and endosperm proceeds within the embryo-sac, the sac wall enlarges and combines with the nucellus (which is likewise enlarging) and the integument to form the seed-coat. The ovary wall develops to form the fruit or pericarp, whose form is closely associated with the manner of distribution of the seed.Frequently the influence of fertilization is felt
beyond the ovary, and
other parts of the flower take part in the formation of the fruit,
e.g. the floral receptacle in the apple, strawberry and others.
The character of the seed-coat bears a definite
relation to that of the fruit. They protect the embryo and aid in
dissemination; they may also directly promote germination. Among
plants with indehiscent fruits, the fruit generally provides
protection for of the embryo and secures dissemination. In this
case, the seed-coat is only slightly developed. If the fruit is
dehiscent
and the seed is exposed, the seed-coat is generally well developed,
and must discharge the functions otherwise executed by the
fruit.
Economic importance
Agriculture is almost entirely dependent on angiosperms, either directly or indirectly through livestock feed. Of all the families plants, the Poaceae, or grass family, is by far the most important, providing the bulk of all feedstocks (rice, corn (maize), wheat, barley, rye, oats, pearl millet, sugar cane, sorghum). The Fabaceae, or legume family, comes in second place. Also of high importance are the Solanaceae, or nightshade family (potatoes, tomatoes, and peppers, among others), the Cucurbitaceae, or gourd family (also including pumpkins and melons), the Brassicaceae, or mustard plant family (including rapeseed and cabbage), and the Apiaceae, or parsley family. Many of our fruits come from the Rutaceae, or rue family, and the Rosaceae, or rose family (including apples, pears, cherries, apricots, plums, etc).In some parts of the world, certain single
species assume paramount importance because of their variety of
uses, for example the coconut (Cocos nucifera) on Pacific
atolls, and the olive
(Olea europaea) in the
Mediterranean
region.
Flowering plants also provide economic resources
in the form of wood,
paper, fiber (cotton, flax, and hemp, among others), medicines
(digitalis, camphor), decorative and
landscaping plants, and many other uses. The main area in which
they are surpassed by other plants is timber production.
See also
References
External links
- Angiosperms – Tree of Life Web Project
- Cronquist, Arthur. (1981) An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
- Dilcher, D. 2000. Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. PNAS [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America] 97: 7030-7036 (available online here)
- Flowering Plant Families of the World
- Oldest Known Flowering Plants Identified By Genes, William J. Cromie, Harvard Gazette, December 16, 1999.
- L. Watson and M.J. Dallwitz (1992 onwards). The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, information retrieval.
- Simpson, M.G. Plant Systematics. Elsevier Academic Press. 2006.
- Raven, P.H., R.F. Evert, S.E. Eichhorn. Biology of Plants, 7th Edition. W.H. Freeman. 2004.
broadleaf in Arabic: مستورات البذور
broadleaf in Bulgarian: Покритосеменни
broadleaf in Min Nan: Khui-hoe si̍t-bu̍t
broadleaf in Catalan: Magnoliofití
broadleaf in Czech: Krytosemenné
broadleaf in Welsh: Planhigyn blodeuol
broadleaf in Danish: Dækfrøede planter
broadleaf in German: Bedecktsamer
broadleaf in Estonian: Katteseemnetaimed
broadleaf in Modern Greek (1453-):
Αγγειόσπερμο
broadleaf in Spanish: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Esperanto: Angiospermoj
broadleaf in Estonian: Katteseemnetaimed
broadleaf in French: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Korean: 속씨식물
broadleaf in Croatian: Kritosjemenjače
broadleaf in Indonesian: Tumbuhan berbiji
tertutup
broadleaf in Icelandic: Dulfrævingar
broadleaf in Italian: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Hebrew: בעלי פרחים
broadleaf in Latin: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Latvian: Segsēkļi
broadleaf in Luxembourgish: Bléieplanzen
broadleaf in Lithuanian: Magnolijūnai
broadleaf in Hungarian: Zárvatermők
broadleaf in Malay (macrolanguage):
Angiosperma
broadleaf in Dutch: Bedektzadigen
broadleaf in Japanese: 被子植物門
broadleaf in Occitan (post 1500):
Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Polish: Okrytonasienne
broadleaf in Portuguese: Angiosperma
broadleaf in Romanian: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Quechua: Qatasqa muruyuq
broadleaf in Russian: Цветковые растения
broadleaf in Sicilian: Magnoliophyta
broadleaf in Slovenian: Kritosemenke
broadleaf in Serbian: Скривеносеменице
broadleaf in Serbo-Croatian:
Skrivenosemenice
broadleaf in Finnish: Koppisiemeniset
broadleaf in Swedish: Gömfröväxter
broadleaf in Tamil: பூக்கும் தாவரம்
broadleaf in Thai: พืชดอก
broadleaf in Vietnamese: Thực vật có hoa
broadleaf in Tonga (Tonga Islands): ʻakau
matala
broadleaf in Turkish: Kapalı tohumlular
broadleaf in Ukrainian: Покритонасінні
broadleaf in Samogitian: Magnolėjūnā
broadleaf in Chinese: 被子植物門